Trademark rights are connected with actual use of a mark. Sometimes that use starts before an federal trademark is filed and sometimes it starts after a federal (intent to use) trademark application is filed. But speculating in trademark applications on marks that you don’t intend to actually use is useless.
This brings me a federal trademark application filed on the following mark:
double doink doubledoink DOUBLE DOINK DOUBLEDOINK Doubledoink Double Doink
That whole thing is the mark of the application.
The applicant included many variations of capitalization and spacing of the two words Double Doink. Let’s break down the mark:
- double doink
- doubledoink
- DOUBLE DOINK
- DOUBLEDOINK
- Doubledoink
- Double Doink
The applicant has six variations of Double Doink in the mark. But you don’t need to, and shouldn’t do this to protect the mark “Double Doink.”
Maybe the applicant here really is going to use all six variations, together, and in that order, as his mark. But that seems very unlikely.
You should pick the way that mark will be used, use it consistently in that way, and apply to register in that way. Then let trademark law do the rest. Trademark law often protects against not only identical copying of a mark, but also against confusingly similar marks. Is “Doubledoink” confusingly similar to “Double Doink” for the same goods/services? Probably.
In many cases, a trademark registration on Double Doink would likely protect the owner from others using the mark with minor different capitalization or spacing–e.g. similar variations of the mark–in connection with the same goods/services. For example, the USPTO found CROSS-OVER to be in conflict with a registered mark CROSSOVER. The hyphen made no difference.
There are exceptions to every rule, but like minor punctuation differences, minor spacing and capitalization differences alone often do not distinguish marks because marks are compared in at least following ways: (1) appearance, (2) sound, and (3) connotation. A similarity in any one of those aspects could be enough to find that the marks are similar. Many times you can’t hear spacing and capitalization differences when a mark is spoken, e.g. its sound. Further, the spacing and capitalization may not sufficiently distinguish the marks visually. Is “Doubledoink” that much different visually from “Double Doink”? No.
Pick a way to present and use your mark. Use it and apply to register it in that way. And let trademark law do the work of stopping the use of similar variations of your mark.
Thanks to Erik Pelton for pointing out this application.