Software Patents

Claims on Manipulating Tools on Toolbar are Obvious

Claims on Manipulating Tools on Toolbar are Obvious

Odom v. Microsoft, 2011-1160 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2011) [PDF]. Inventor Odom sued Microsoft alleging that Microsoft infringed Odom’s U.S. Patent 7,363,592 directed to a method for manipulating groups of tools in toolbars in a computer software application. The district court found certain claims the of ’592 patent invalid as obvious in view of U.S. Patent 6,057,836, stating that Odom had [...]

Positive for Comp.Sci. & Business Methods Pats: Federal Circuit Takes Broad Approach to Patentable Subject Matter

Positive for Comp.Sci. & Business Methods Pats: Federal Circuit Takes Broad Approach to Patentable Subject Matter

Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. BioGen IDEC, No. 2006-1634 (Fed Cir. Aug 31, 2011) [PDF]. In this case the court considered the scope of patentable subject matter under 35 USC 101. While the patents-in-suit are directed toward methods of medical treatment, the scope of patent able subject matter under section 101 is often considered in computer [...]

Aritcles on Chess-Like Computer Game Analogous Prior Art for Patent on Physical Chess-Like Board Game

Aritcles on Chess-Like Computer Game Analogous Prior Art for Patent on Physical Chess-Like Board Game

Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm’t, Inc., Dkt. No. 2010-1290 (Fed. Cir. March 21, 2011) [PDF]. Innovation sued MGA, Wal-Mart, and Toys “R” Us (collectively, MGA) for infringement of Innovation’s U.S. Patent No. 7,264,242. The ’242 patent is directed to a light-reflecting physical board game. MGA’s accused game is Laser Battle, a physical board game [...]

Shredding Parties to Destroy Evidence Could Cost Rambus $350+ Mil

Shredding Parties to Destroy Evidence Could Cost Rambus $350+ Mil

Hynix Semiconductor v. Rambus, 2009-1299 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2011) [PDF] and Micron Technology v. Rambus, 2009-1263 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2011) [PDF]. In both of the above cited cases Rambus sued makers of SDRAM and DDR SDRAM alleging infringement of a number of Rambus owned patents.  A key issue addressed by the Federal Circuit [...]

Claim Against Yahoo! Messager Requires Logic Operations on Same Message(s)

Claim Against Yahoo! Messager Requires Logic Operations on Same Message(s)

Creative Internet Adver. Corp. v. Yahoo!, Inc., 2010-1215 (Fed Cir. April 22, 2011) [PDF]. Creative sued Yahoo! claiming Yahoo!’s instant messaging product, Yahoo! Messenger infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,205,432. The ’432 patent is directed to a system where references to advertisements are inserted between end users of an instant messaging software. The claim at issue [...]

The Difference One Word Makes: “Creating a Database ‘of’ Properties” Required a Prepopulated Database

The Difference One Word Makes: “Creating a Database ‘of’ Properties” Required a Prepopulated Database

Move, Inc. v. Real Estate Alliance, Dkt No. 2010-1236 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 22, 2011) [PDF]. Move sued Real Estate Alliance (Real) seeking declaratory judgment that Real’s U.S. Patent No. 4,870,576, and 5,032,989 (the ’989 patent) were invalid. Real appealed the district courts construction of claim 1 of the ’989 patent.  Claim 1 provides: A method [...]

Claims Require “Root Bus Controller” be Highest Order Bus Controller in Parallel Computing System

Claims Require “Root Bus Controller” be Highest Order Bus Controller in Parallel Computing System

Fifth Generation Computer Corp. v.  IBM, Dkt No. 2010-1201 (Fed. Cir. Jan 26, 2011) [PDF]. Fifth Generation sued IBM for alleged infringement of US patent 6,000,024, which is directed to binary tree parallel computing systems.  It  is well known that parallel computing systems attempt to increase processing speed by the use of multiple processors operating [...]

Repeated References to “Still” Image Precludes Coverage of Video Dispite Alternative Embodiment Reference

Repeated References to “Still” Image Precludes Coverage of Video Dispite Alternative Embodiment Reference

St. Clair Intellectual Prop. Consultants v. Cannon, 2009-1052 (Fed. Cir. 2011) [PDF] This case raised the issue of whether one or two references to an alternative embodiment (MPEG) in the specification can overcome the predominance and repeated reference to the first embodiment (still images). Two issues are explored here (1) whether all the claims were [...]

“Use” Infringment of a System Requires Control Sufficient to Put System in Service

“Use” Infringment of a System Requires Control Sufficient to Put System in Service

Centrillion Data Systems LLC v. Quest Communications International, 2010-1110  (Fed. Cir.  Jan 20, 2010) [PDF] This case addresses the issue of whether infringement may be found for a “use”–under 35 U.S.C. 271(a)– of a system claim, which includes elements in the possession of more than one actor, e.g., the service provider possesses some elements and [...]