http://www.waltmire.com/blog/archives/2007/06/25/injunction-granted-for-license-only-plaintiff-ieee-80211a-and-80211g-technology/ Patent Law :: Focusing on Software and Electronic Arts Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:39:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.waltmire.com/blog/archives/2007/06/25/injunction-granted-for-license-only-plaintiff-ieee-80211a-and-80211g-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1356 Eric Waltmire’s Blog » Noncompeting Plaintiffs: Irreparable Harm Analysis Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:20:19 +0000 http://www.waltmire.com/blog/archives/2007/06/25/injunction-granted-for-license-only-plaintiff-ieee-80211a-and-80211g-technology/#comment-1356 [...] Previously I reported on the CSIRO v. Buffalo Technology case. There, the district court found CSIRO’s patent No. 5,487,069 covered all 802.11a/g wireless technology and granted a permanent injunction against a wireless LAN vendor. CSIRO does not practice its patents, but instead seeks licenses from third parties. The court’s irreparable harm analysis is particularly interesting in light of CSIRO’s non-practicing status. [...] [...] Previously I reported on the CSIRO v. Buffalo Technology case. There, the district court found CSIRO’s patent No. 5,487,069 covered all 802.11a/g wireless technology and granted a permanent injunction against a wireless LAN vendor. CSIRO does not practice its patents, but instead seeks licenses from third parties. The court’s irreparable harm analysis is particularly interesting in light of CSIRO’s non-practicing status. [...]

]]>