AMEX Gift Cards Not Infringing

AMEX Gift Cards Not Infringing

Privacash, Inc. v. Am. Express Co., No. 2011-1027 (Aug. 11, 2011) [PDF]. Privacash sued AMEX alleging that AMEX gift cards infringed U.S. Patent 7,328,181. The ’181 provides a system with the objective of providing an anonymous and untraceable means for transacting purchases over the internet. AMEX cards are activated when purchased and a usable until the [...]

Full Story »
Claims on Manipulating Tools on Toolbar are Obvious

Claims on Manipulating Tools on Toolbar are Obvious

Odom v. Microsoft, 2011-1160 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2011) [PDF]. Inventor Odom sued Microsoft alleging that Microsoft infringed Odom’s U.S. Patent 7,363,592 directed to a method for manipulating groups of tools in toolbars in a computer software application. The district court found certain claims the of ’592 patent invalid as obvious in view of U.S. Patent 6,057,836, stating that Odom had [...]

Full Story »
Positive for Comp.Sci. & Business Methods Pats: Federal Circuit Takes Broad Approach to Patentable Subject Matter

Positive for Comp.Sci. & Business Methods Pats: Federal Circuit Takes Broad Approach to Patentable Subject Matter

Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. BioGen IDEC, No. 2006-1634 (Fed Cir. Aug 31, 2011) [PDF]. In this case the court considered the scope of patentable subject matter under 35 USC 101. While the patents-in-suit are directed toward methods of medical treatment, the scope of patent able subject matter under section 101 is often considered in computer [...]

Aritcles on Chess-Like Computer Game Analogous Prior Art for Patent on Physical Chess-Like Board Game

Aritcles on Chess-Like Computer Game Analogous Prior Art for Patent on Physical Chess-Like Board Game

Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm’t, Inc., Dkt. No. 2010-1290 (Fed. Cir. March 21, 2011) [PDF]. Innovation sued MGA, Wal-Mart, and Toys “R” Us (collectively, MGA) for infringement of Innovation’s U.S. Patent No. 7,264,242. The ’242 patent is directed to a light-reflecting physical board game. MGA’s accused game is Laser Battle, a physical board game [...]

Shredding Parties to Destroy Evidence Could Cost Rambus $350+ Mil

Shredding Parties to Destroy Evidence Could Cost Rambus $350+ Mil

Hynix Semiconductor v. Rambus, 2009-1299 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2011) [PDF] and Micron Technology v. Rambus, 2009-1263 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2011) [PDF]. In both of the above cited cases Rambus sued makers of SDRAM and DDR SDRAM alleging infringement of a number of Rambus owned patents.  A key issue addressed by the Federal Circuit [...]